The Legacy of Eugenics: Family Secrets, Love and Pride

The subhuman treatment of people with disabilities is not a distant memory for many people, but for some, it is a daily reality. The Americans with Disabilities Act was passed merely 34 years ago. However, these issues are not something families often discuss. 

As a genealogist, I seek out records to understand what life was like for my ancestors: their thoughts, feelings, and experiences through a historical lens. The first step in genealogical research is interviewing living relatives, who provide information that guides your research. That is where I began researching my maternal great-grandfather, James Peckels.

James Donald Peckels was born on May 29th, 1923, in Parkville, St. Louis County, Minnesota. His father, Peter, was Luxembourgian, and his mother, Nellie, was Irish. He only went to school through the eighth grade, and by age 17, James was working for the family junkyard. A family story says that he made enough money to buy a car, but his father eventually forced him to give it to his brother, who was more successful with a wife and children.

He was drafted into the U.S. Army in 1942 at 19 years old. I knew he received an honorable discharge from the military but never heard why, so I requested his military records from the National Archives. Unfortunately, the National Archives suffered a fire in 1973 that destroyed most of the Army personnel records. After many months of waiting, I received scans of some of his military records, albeit charred, thanks to some diligent NARA staff. What I learned was shocking.

On September 20th, 1944, he became unfit for duty due to epilepsy: grand mal and petit mal. The onset was listed as 1931 when he would’ve been eight years old. However, it was not in the induction papers. None of us knew about his condition. I heard stories that he would stay awake for days like he was afraid to fall asleep. Now I know that some types of childhood epilepsy cause nocturnal seizures. I can’t reconcile how he was able to keep his disability secret, even from his children. Maybe the stress of the war caused it to flare up, or he self-medicated. I will never really know. 

What I think I understand is why. In Minnesota in 1945, people with epilepsy were forbidden to marry by a clause in the marriage license application. A 1914 article stated, “A strong moral sentiment already exists against the marriage of persons tainted with insanity, epilepsy and venereal diseases.” People with epilepsy were considered mentally deficient, physically incapable, and disruptive people. If he wanted to be married, he would have to hide his condition.

A Minnesota child welfare manual says, “An epileptic person frequently is a burden and even a disrupting influence in the family. Also, he is frequently unadjusted in the community and is usually dissatisfied and unhappy.” In 1962, there were laws restricting marriage for people with epilepsy in six states. Throughout the 20th century, people with epilepsy were subject to job discrimination, marriage, inequality, forced sterilization, and institutionalization.  

It is sobering to think that he may have had the same condition as I do. It just did not have a name back then. My family was the ideal target of eugenics legislation: people with an undesirable, heritable condition. If the law had worked as intended, I would not exist. Was I doomed to be a poorly adjusted, dissatisfied, and unhappy human being because of my genes? 

My disability has been a strength in many ways–it made me persistent, curious, and even optimistic. That is what disability pride means to me: accepting the challenges that come with having a disability while celebrating how I have become better for it and remembering those who were not lucky enough to celebrate their differences. 

How to Destroy Stubborn Brick Walls using Mystery Images


A Mysterious Love Letter

T(isztelt) Womácska/o Boriska kisasszonynak
Német Kucsova út
Munkács
Bereg megye

H(onoured) Miss Womácska/o Boriska
Németkucsova Street
Munkács
Bereg County

Kedves Boriska,
it(t) küldöm magamat néked.
Isten véled aviszt látásig.
Ölelem a k(edves) szüleidet is a Teréz is sokat/soksz.

Dear Boriska,
I’m sending myself here.
Goodbye until we meet again.
Hugs to your dear parents and Teréz too.

A variant of the given name Borbala, Boriska is a Hungarian girl’s name. In English, Borbala is equivalent to Barbara. The sister of Anton’s future wife, Barbara Vomacsko, was Terezia, born in 1903. Barbara may have been known by the nickname Boriska.

This may explain the unidentified “Boris Vomacsko” who announced Maria Vomacsko’s death in 1911.


Tracing the History of A Military Photo

Colors may not be accurate.

Anton Pfeifer is pictured wearing the uniform of the Austro-Hungarian army sometime between 1914 and 1918. At this time, his village of Németkucsova was part of Austria-Hungary.

While I do not have any official records of his service, the specific nature of Austro-Hungarian uniforms allows me to gather information about his rank and time period of service through this photo.


In 1869, the Austro-Hungarian army replaced their white uniforms with dark blue (dunkelblau) ones. When World War I began, they switched to the M1908 pike grey (hechtgrau) field tunic (feldbluse). It is likely that this is the uniform worn by Anton in the photo. Later on, the field grey color (feldgrau) was introduced as supplies allowed, replacing the pike grey.


From Head to Toe

In the photo, Anton can be seen wearing a ski cap known as a feldkappe. The cap has flaps that can be pulled over the ears for warmth, and a royal cypher emblem on top. By 1917, the feldkappe was replaced by helmets, so the photo was likely taken before this time.

In the photo, Anton’s stand-up collar does not display any stars indicating his rank. This means he was a private, also known as a gemeiner. The stand-up collars were eventually replaced with stand and fall collars due to discomfort. Anton is also wearing a stock tie, or halsbinde, to protect his neck from irritation.

Replica Halsbinde

Upon closer examination, Anton’s upper right leg and pant seams appear to have woolen decoration, which is a signature of the Hungarian army. However, it is difficult to confirm this for certain. Anton is also wearing gaiters, which suggests that he was an infantryman.


What About the Pom-Poms?

General Lanyard

Qualification lanyards were given to soldiers who demonstrated proficiency in certain skills, such as marksmanship or engineering. Based on the fact that Anton was an infantryman, it can be inferred that he earned his lanyard through his marksmanship skills. The lanyard would have been either red or green in color.


Sources

Austro-Hungarian Army Marksmanship Lanyards

Galician soldier’s equipment of the 13th Infantry Regiment